Ethereum Blockchain Tools
Integrates with Ethereum blockchain networks to provide smart contract auditing, wallet analysis, token balance checking, and profitability tracking using Web3.js, Moralis, and Etherscan APIs.
0/100
0Tools
6Findings
16Stars
—Downloads
Mar 19, 2026Last Scanned
Score Breakdown5 categories
Code100
Dependencies70
Config22
Description100
Behavior100
OWASP MCP Top 10 Coverage
MCP10-supply-chainMCP10-supply-chainFail
MCP02-tool-poisoningMCP02-tool-poisoningPass
MCP07-insecure-configMCP07-insecure-configFail
MCP08-dependency-vulnMCP08-dependency-vulnFail
MCP01-prompt-injectionMCP01-prompt-injectionPass
MCP03-command-injectionMCP03-command-injectionPass
MCP04-data-exfiltrationMCP04-data-exfiltrationFail
MCP09-logging-monitoringMCP09-logging-monitoringPass
MCP05-privilege-escalationMCP05-privilege-escalationFail
MCP06-excessive-permissionsMCP06-excessive-permissionsPass
Findings6
3critical
2high
0medium
1low
0informational
criticalG7DNS-Based Data Exfiltration ChannelMCP04-data-exfiltrationAML.T0040
Pattern "(?:\$\{|\+|concat|format).*\.(?:[a-z0-9-]{3,}\.){1,3}[a-z]{2,6}['"`]" matched in source_code: "${")) ? eth_rpc : 'https://eth.llamarpc.com'" (at position 2102)
Remove all dynamic DNS queries where subdomain content is derived from application data, user input, or system information. DNS exfiltration channels are invisible to most monitoring tools and operate even through strict HTTP firewalls.
If DNS-based service discovery is required, use a static list of known-good hostnames. Never construct DNS query hostnames by concatenating or encoding application data. Deploy DNS logging (e.g., passive DNS, BIND query logs) and alert on high-entropy subdomain queries.
criticalK14Agent Credential Propagation via Shared StateMCP05-privilege-escalationAML.T0054
Pattern "(process\.env|os\.environ|setenv|putenv).*(?:token|credential|api[_\s-]?key|secret|password)" matched in source_code: "process.env.MORALIS_API_KEY" (at position 1639)
Never write credentials to shared agent state. Use credential vaults (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager) with per-agent scoped access. Implement OAuth token exchange (RFC 8693) for cross-agent authorization. Redact credentials from all agent outputs before writing to shared memory. Required by OWASP ASI03/ASI07 and MAESTRO L7.
criticalQ13MCP Bridge Package Supply Chain AttackMCP10-supply-chainAML.T0054
Pattern "["']@modelcontextprotocol/sdk["']\s*:\s*["'](?:\^|~|\*|latest)" matched in source_code: ""@modelcontextprotocol/sdk": "^" (at position 2952)
MCP bridge packages (mcp-remote, mcp-proxy, @modelcontextprotocol/sdk, fastmcp) are high-value supply chain targets — CVE-2025-6514 (CVSS 9.6) in mcp-remote affected 437,000+ installs. Always pin exact versions (no ^ or ~ ranges). Use lockfiles (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock). Never run `npx mcp-remote` without version pinning. Verify package integrity with `npm audit` or `pip-audit` before deployment. Reference: CVE-2025-6514, OWASP ASI04.
highD1Known CVEs in DependenciesMCP08-dependency-vuln
Dependency "@modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.7.0" has known CVEs:
Update dependencies to versions that patch known CVEs. Run 'npm audit fix' or 'pip-audit' to identify and resolve vulnerable dependencies.
highD1Known CVEs in DependenciesMCP08-dependency-vuln
Dependency "axios@1.8.3" has known CVEs:
Update dependencies to versions that patch known CVEs. Run 'npm audit fix' or 'pip-audit' to identify and resolve vulnerable dependencies.
lowF4MCP Spec Non-ComplianceMCP07-insecure-config
Server fails MCP spec compliance checks: required:server_name; required:server_version; required:protocol_version; recommended:tool_descriptions; recommended:parameter_descriptions
Follow the MCP specification for server metadata. Include server name, version, and protocol version. Provide descriptions for all tools and parameters.
Security Category Deep Dive
Sub-Category Tree · Remediation Roadmap · Attack Stories · Compliance Overlay · ATLAS Techniques · Maturity Model
Prompt Injection
Prompt & context manipulation attacks
69
MATURITY
14
RULES
5
SUB-CATS
1
GAPS
64%
IMPL.
56
TESTS
1
STORIES
100%3 rules
Injection via tool descriptions and parameter fields
GAP-001Prompt Injection Coverage GapMissing detection coverage for emerging prompt injection attack variants not addressed by current rules
100%4 rules
Hidden instructions via external content and tool responses
100%2 rules
Context window saturation and prior-approval exploitation
100%3 rules
Payload hiding via invisible chars, base64, schema fields
100%2 rules
Injection via prompt templates and runtime tool output